When It Stops Being A Good Compromise and Becomes Compromising?
To compromise is seen as a weakness in some, but as a strength in other societies. And often it is more due to ego than to results that people are not seeking compromises. Check out if you agree with Yana‘s and Tom‘s views or if you don‘t want to compromise.
Today’s Episode:
- [00:45] Tom and Yana discuss the topic compromise and compromising.
- [01:43] Yana explains her views on compromise and when it is necessary.
- [03:09] She gives examples of what she means when she says she might or might not compromise.
- [05:24] Tom offers his views on compromise and explains why he says sometimes he lets his emotions rule.
- [07:51] Does being able to compromise, impact the speed of how you can achieve the result?
- [09:08] Yana believes the worst possible scenario is when you compromise because you are delaying the more significant decision.
- [10:16] Tom thinks that compromising for peace because you shy away from the conflict is always the wrong thing to do.
- [11:43] When would you not compromise and stand to fight?
- [12:54] Tom says that when you are hiring, there will be pros and cons.
- [13:42] Do you agree with the statement, if it’s not a hell yes then it’s hell no?
- [15:01] Younger teams and people with less experience like to have supervisors with excellent skills, but will that keep you from excelling?
- [17:48] Younger people want to try different things and go different paths; the challenge is to get them all on the same page.
- [19:34] Yana gives an example of Block.one (EOS) vs SEC case as an industry-level compromise. [more on this here https://competitivecompliance.co/block-one-settlement-with-sec/]
- [21:45] Tom thinks that her example is a perfect example of a win-win compromise.
- [23:17] Look at compromise as opportunities to look for a win-win situation.